|
Improving the outcomes of patients experiencing an impending MI by preparing nursing students to
recognize the important findings in these patients, interact therapeutically with the patient, and initiate
treatments in a timely manner was the focus of the DNP project.
Background
While traditional lecture methods dominate most nursing school classrooms, it does not usually provide an
avenue for active learning and yet, many students repeatedly explain that they “learn best by doing”. According to
Kane (2004), active learning may be described as a theory, but it is also associated with implementing teaching
methodologies that provide numerous examples of activities that educators can use in different learning
environments. In considering clinical practice opportunities, many nursing students may not have the occurrence to
care for a patient experiencing an impending MI. A need for change in teaching methods is recognized.
In the past several years, simulation has gained much popularity in nursing education and review of
literature reveals much discussion on the topic. The literature gives account of the evolution of simulation
activities and their impact on bridging theory with practice. This is readily evidenced by reviewing how flight
simulators have improved aviation and space program activities. In healthcare, the development of Resusci-Anne
began the movement towards simulation activities as a plausible way of teaching. Within medical-education,
simulation-based learning has been found to be superior for acquiring critical assessment and management skills,
(Steadman, Coates, Huang, Matevosian, Larman, McCullough and Ariel, 2006). In an effort to assist students in
learning and thereby, better improve their ability to impact patient outcomes, a change in teaching methods was
undertaken.
Quality Improvement
Newhouse, Pettit, Poe, and Rocco (2006) describe quality improvement projects as means to understand and
improve processes, where individuals work together to improve outcomes, in order to benefit individuals served by
the organization. Roueche, Baker, and Rose (1989) stress the importance of an organization knowing “what business
it is in” and conclude that community colleges should, among other qualities, build relationships with learners,
and be adaptable to new conditions or circumstances, with ever awareness of its community. The DNP student’s
project was likened to a “microsystem in health care”, described by Godfrey, Nelson, Wasson, Mohr, and Batalden
(2003) where a small functional unit became the focus for improvement. The system was called upon by the project’s
focus to remember what business it’s in, accommodate diverse learning needs of students, and increase success for
the student and program as a whole, and impact patient outcomes.
Duke University Medical Center (2005) presented The FADE Model, a method of quality improvement (QI),
which provided the approach used to assess the present system targeted for change, and implement the proposed plan
for change. The four steps of the FADE QI model include: 1) focus, 2) analyze, 3) develop, and 4) execute and
evaluate.
EBP Model
The Iowa Model of Evidenced-Based Practice to Promote Quality Care provided the standard framework for
the DNP project while the Nursing Education Simulation Framework allowed the best practices to become executable
processes within the chosen system. The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Quality Care was chosen as
the research model for the project as Titler (2007) reports that this model approaches evidence based practice from
an organizational perspective rather than from the perspective of an individual provider. The Nursing Education
Simulation Framework was developed and tested for the National League for Nursing/Laerdal Simulation Study
(Jefferies, 2005) and has five conceptual components which include 1) teacher factors, 2) student factors, 3)
educational practices that need to be incorporated into the instruction, 4) simulation design characteristics, and
5) expected student outcomes.
|