Quarterly care planning meetings often include the resident or designated representative (when they can
attend), caregiver and interdisciplinary team members. Many of our residents have various wounds, other than
due to pressure. Residents with arterial/ venous insufficiency (peripheral vascular disease/ stasis ulcers),
diabetic, or surgical wounds are younger than the population with pressure ulcers. Utilization of a local
hospital’s wound center for vascular, diabetic and surgical wounds are made when pertinent to diagnosing or
evaluating treatment options. Management of these other wounds are more challenging as residents often do not
wish to raise legs, wear special hose, follow diets, or have dressing changed, per physician orders for
frequency. This mixed population demands weekly education with physician present. Important considerations
include residents’ mental competency, danger to self or others with refusal, prior life style preferences and
resident’s goals and objectives for his/ her health and happiness. The team feels that appropriate care is a
balance between what is needed and safe versus individual rights and preferences.
Mitigating Risk Factors
The comprehensive care plan is established to include risk, skin break reasons,
resident’s strengths or weaknesses, goals, time frames, measurable objectives, interventions and periodic
evaluations. Care plans must mitigate and lower risk factors that support appropriate interventions (e.g. -
high risk due to immobility might lead to interventions that include (not limited to) exercise rehabilitation
program, turning and repositioning, and/ or toileting schedule. The team monitors plan for needed change at
least quarterly (and more often to add or delete interventions). Outcome of the pressure ulcer healing progress
is noted. A high percent (above 98%) of residents with pressure ulcer were admitted with their skin breaks. The
skin care team concentrated more on the risk factors and healing rates rather than the quality indicators of
high risk pressure ulcers.
Outcomes Realized
1. Rates for high-risk pressure ulcers:
Year
Observed Percent Range
Monthly Average
2007
From 57% to 0%
22%
2008
From 50% to 8.3%
30%
2009
From 30% to 0%
15% (thus far, 10 months)
2. Healing rates:
Year
Observed Range
Monthly Average
2007
Not measured consistently
Unable to determine
2008
From 7 to 0
1.8
2009
From 7 to 1
3.9
In 2007 the new program was created and its implementation depended on proper recruitment and much education.
The healing average per month increased from 1.8 to 3.9 over the two-year span. This calculates to an average
of 2.1 more pressure ulcers that were healed each month of 2009 compared to 2008. In 2009, both units had
improvements in healing rates and both units won awards for pressure ulcer healing rates.
Back to Top
|